SEARCH BOX
10-02-2008, 02:45 PM
|
#51 |
|
Posts: 1724
|
Re: Ohio Rethuglicans stopped dead in their tracks
"William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in message
news:clark-... > In article <>, > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-... >> > In article <>, >> > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: >> > >> >> "William Clark" <> wrote in message >> >> news:wclark2-... >> >> > In article >> >> > <alangbaker->, >> >> > Alan Baker <> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> In article >> >> >> <clark->, >> >> >> "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article >> >> >> > <alangbaker->, >> >> >> > Alan Baker <> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > In article >> >> >> > > <wclark2->, >> >> >> > > William Clark <> wrote: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > In article >> >> >> > > > <alangbaker->, >> >> >> > > > Alan Baker <> wrote: >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > In article <>, >> >> >> > > > > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > "William Clark" <> wrote in >> >> >> > > > > > message >> >> >> > > > > > news:wclark2--state >> >> >> > > > > > .ed >> >> >> > > > > > u.. >> >> >> > > > > > . >> >> >> > > > > > >> > ...snip,snip ... >> > >> >> >> I agree it was misleading, I just don't think there was any intent >> >> >> to >> >> >> mislead people into thinking it was from you. >> >> >> >> >> >> As to why he clipped all your text, I think that was just an error. >> >> > >> >> > Yes, I don't think he is competent enough with the newsreader to do >> >> > it >> >> > deliberately. >> >> >> >> So how long are you two dopes going to fret over this? >> > >> > Oh, how about until you learn to write more than one sentence at a >> > time? >> > >> LOL! Like your ONE sentence response above. > > That is more than enough for your comprehension. But here's a second in > case you feel ignored. Your pettyness knows no limits. |
|
|
|
|
10-02-2008, 03:08 PM
|
#52 |
|
Posts: 1514
|
Re: Ohio Rethuglicans stopped dead in their tracks
In article <>,
"MNMikeW" <> wrote: > "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in message > news:clark-... > > In article <>, > > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <> wrote in message > >> news:wclark2-... > >> > In article <>, > >> > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: > >> > > >> >> "William Clark" <> wrote in message > >> >> news:wclark2-... > >> >> > In article > >> >> > <alangbaker->, > >> >> > Alan Baker <> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> In article > >> >> >> <clark->, > >> >> >> "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > In article > >> >> >> > <alangbaker->, > >> >> >> > Alan Baker <> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > In article > >> >> >> > > <wclark2->, > >> >> >> > > William Clark <> wrote: > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > In article > >> >> >> > > > <alangbaker->, > >> >> >> > > > Alan Baker <> wrote: > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > In article <>, > >> >> >> > > > > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > "William Clark" <> wrote in > >> >> >> > > > > > message > >> >> >> > > > > > news:wclark2--st > >> >> >> > > > > > ate > >> >> >> > > > > > .ed > >> >> >> > > > > > u.. > >> >> >> > > > > > . > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> > ...snip,snip ... > >> > > >> >> >> I agree it was misleading, I just don't think there was any intent > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> mislead people into thinking it was from you. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> As to why he clipped all your text, I think that was just an error. > >> >> > > >> >> > Yes, I don't think he is competent enough with the newsreader to do > >> >> > it > >> >> > deliberately. > >> >> > >> >> So how long are you two dopes going to fret over this? > >> > > >> > Oh, how about until you learn to write more than one sentence at a > >> > time? > >> > > >> LOL! Like your ONE sentence response above. > > > > That is more than enough for your comprehension. But here's a second in > > case you feel ignored. > > Your pettyness knows no limits. Not to be petty, but it should be "pettiness". :-) |
|
|
|
10-02-2008, 04:13 PM
|
#53 |
|
Posts: 1724
|
Re: Ohio Rethuglicans stopped dead in their tracks
"William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in message
news:clark-... > In article <>, > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: > >> "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in >> message >> news:clark-... >> > In article <>, >> > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: >> > >> >> "William Clark" <> wrote in message >> >> news:wclark2-... >> >> > In article <>, >> >> > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "William Clark" <> wrote in message >> >> >> news:wclark2-... >> >> >> > In article >> >> >> > <alangbaker->, >> >> >> > Alan Baker <> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> In article >> >> >> >> <clark->, >> >> >> >> "William A. T. Clark" <> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article >> >> >> >> > <alangbaker->, >> >> >> >> > Alan Baker <> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > In article >> >> >> >> > > <wclark2->, >> >> >> >> > > William Clark <> wrote: >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > > In article >> >> >> >> > > > <alangbaker->, >> >> >> >> > > > Alan Baker <> wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > In article <>, >> >> >> >> > > > > "MNMikeW" <> wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > "William Clark" <> wrote >> >> >> >> > > > > > in >> >> >> >> > > > > > message >> >> >> >> > > > > > news:wclark2--st >> >> >> >> > > > > > ate >> >> >> >> > > > > > .ed >> >> >> >> > > > > > u.. >> >> >> >> > > > > > . >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> > ...snip,snip ... >> >> > >> >> >> >> I agree it was misleading, I just don't think there was any >> >> >> >> intent >> >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> mislead people into thinking it was from you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> As to why he clipped all your text, I think that was just an >> >> >> >> error. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Yes, I don't think he is competent enough with the newsreader to >> >> >> > do >> >> >> > it >> >> >> > deliberately. >> >> >> >> >> >> So how long are you two dopes going to fret over this? >> >> > >> >> > Oh, how about until you learn to write more than one sentence at a >> >> > time? >> >> > >> >> LOL! Like your ONE sentence response above. >> > >> > That is more than enough for your comprehension. But here's a second in >> > case you feel ignored. >> >> Your pettyness knows no limits. > > Not to be petty, but it should be "pettiness". :-) Demothugry in action in Ohio. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4_mu-PyLZI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weyrE9jLGn0 I can only imagine Williams howling if Dem observers were turned away. |
|
|
|
10-03-2008, 10:38 AM
|
#54 |
|
Posts: 523
|
Re: Ohio Rethuglicans stopped dead in their tracks
On 1-Oct-2008, William Clark <> wrote:
> > > > If the source is accurate, who cares what it is? > > Well, phase two of this farce is done, and the Ohio Circuit Court has > tossed out the Rethuglicans' appeal against the State Supreme and > Federal Courts' rulings that rejected their suit to stop one-stop voting. > > Guess they will just have to live with their own legislation. Poll > centers report extremely brisk business in Ohio yesterday on the first > day of early voting, especially among first time voters. The Quinnipiac > University poll now gives Obama an 8 point lead in Ohio. The cemetaries are emptying as we speak! Vote early and often!
__________________ bill-o Play the ball as it lies. Play the course as you find it. And if you canÂt do either, do what is fair. |
|
|
Linear Mode
