Go Back   GolfingUpdate Forum > General Golf Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-25-2008, 01:51 PM   #11
Bar
 
Posts: 710
Default Re: Dumb Dems

Miss Anne Thrope wrote:
> A golfer calling people dumb.
>
> It's irony on a base level, but I still enjoy it.
>

They let you out of jail? What were you in for DUI?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-25-2008, 02:55 PM   #12
William A. T. Clark
 
Posts: 1515
Default Re: Dumb Dems

In article <>,
"the Moderator" <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com> wrote:

> "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in message
> news:clark-...
> > In article <nnDCk.1227$>,
> > "Stapler" <> wrote:
> >
> >> William Clark wrote:
> >> > In article <>, The Professor <>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
> >> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna
> >> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that
> >> >> already too?
> >> >>
> >> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
> >> >
> >> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
> >> > Roosevelt was.
> >>
> >> Fuckhead.
> >
> > Another stellar contribution to informed debate.
>
> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How is
> that informed debate?

Oh, well, next time I'll remember to put a smiley on for the benefit of
the ironically challenged ;-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 06:22 PM   #13
The_Professor
 
Posts: 865
Default Re: Dumb Dems

On Sep 24, 10:04 pm, William Clark <wcla...@colnospamumbus.rr.com>
wrote:
> In article <48DADA61.9C862...@att.net>, The Professor <D...@att.net>
> wrote:
>
> > So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
> > Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna do
> > next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that
> > already too?
>
> > What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
>
> There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
> Roosevelt was.

You speculation about Palin would have to end with the word "either"
to be rhetotically logical.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 08:06 PM   #14
R&B
 
Posts: 1676
Default Re: Dumb Dems

"the Moderator" <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in
> message
> news:clark-...
>> In article <nnDCk.1227$>,
>> "Stapler" <> wrote:
>>
>>> William Clark wrote:
>>> > In article <>, The Professor <>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
>>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna
>>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that
>>> >> already too?
>>> >>
>>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
>>> >
>>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
>>> > Roosevelt was.
>>>
>>> Fuckhead.
>>
>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate.
>
> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How is
> that informed debate?


She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school kid
who studies Civics knows that.

Gimme a break.

randy
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 08:10 PM   #15
The_Professor
 
Posts: 865
Default Re: Dumb Dems

On Sep 25, 3:06 pm, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusin...@all.com> wrote:
> "the Moderator" <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message
>
> news:...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
> > message
> >news:clark-...
> >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>,
> >> "Stapler" <stap...@tmp.com> wrote:
>
> >>> William Clark wrote:
> >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...@att.net>, The Professor <D...@att.net>
> >>> > wrote:
>
> >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
> >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna
> >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that
> >>> >> already too?
>
> >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
>
> >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
> >>> > Roosevelt was.
>
> >>> Fuckhead.
>
> >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate.
>
> > Informed debate?  You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was?  How is
> > that informed debate?
>
> She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is.  Any junior high school kid
> who studies Civics knows that.
>
> Gimme a break.
>
> randy- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Show me a statement, and statement Bush issued as a doctrine. Good
luck! Post the URL. I am not interested in some policy statement a
commentator like Chuckie Gibson would call a doctrine...either the
Bush Whitehouse isssued a doctrine, calling it such, or they didn't.
Seems to me they didn't and Chucko was dipping a little too much into
the absinthe when he imagined this doctrine!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 08:17 PM   #16
Alan Baker
 
Posts: 1581
Default Re: Dumb Dems

In article
<e31b751d-a268-4b2f-9f12->,
The_Professor <> wrote:

> On Sep 25, 3:06 pm, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusin...@all.com> wrote:
> > "the Moderator" <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
> > > message
> > >news:clark-...
> > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>,
> > >> "Stapler" <stap...@tmp.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>> William Clark wrote:
> > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...@att.net>, The Professor <D...@att.net>
> > >>> > wrote:
> >
> > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
> > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna
> > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that
> > >>> >> already too?
> >
> > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
> >
> > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
> > >>> > Roosevelt was.
> >
> > >>> Fuckhead.
> >
> > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate.
> >
> > > Informed debate?  You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was?  How is
> > > that informed debate?
> >
> > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is.  Any junior high school kid
> > who studies Civics knows that.
> >
> > Gimme a break.
> >
> > randy- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Show me a statement, and statement Bush issued as a doctrine. Good
> luck! Post the URL. I am not interested in some policy statement a
> commentator like Chuckie Gibson would call a doctrine...either the
> Bush Whitehouse isssued a doctrine, calling it such, or they didn't.
> Seems to me they didn't and Chucko was dipping a little too much into
> the absinthe when he imagined this doctrine!

"doctrine |?d?ktrin|
noun
a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party,
or other group : the doctrine of predestination.
€ a stated principle of government policy, mainly in foreign or military
affairs : the Monroe Doctrine.
ORIGIN late Middle English : from Old French, from Latin doctrina
Œteaching, learning,¹ from doctor Œteacher,¹ from docere Œteach.¹"

<http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/>
__________________
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 08:33 PM   #17
The_Professor
 
Posts: 865
Default Re: Dumb Dems

On Sep 25, 3:17 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote:
> In article
> <e31b751d-a268-4b2f-9f12-24e48d798...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  The_Professor <d...@att.net> wrote:
> > On Sep 25, 3:06 pm, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusin...@all.com> wrote:
> > > "the Moderator" <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:...
>
> > > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...@nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
> > > > message
> > > >news:clark-...
> > > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>,
> > > >> "Stapler" <stap...@tmp.com> wrote:
>
> > > >>> William Clark wrote:
> > > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...@att.net>, The Professor <D...@att.net>
> > > >>> > wrote:
>
> > > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
> > > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna
> > > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that
> > > >>> >> already too?
>
> > > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
>
> > > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
> > > >>> > Roosevelt was.
>
> > > >>> Fuckhead.
>
> > > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate.
>
> > > > Informed debate?  You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was?  How is
> > > > that informed debate?
>
> > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is.  Any junior high school kid
> > > who studies Civics knows that.
>
> > > Gimme a break.
>
> > > randy- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Show me a  statement, and statement Bush issued as a doctrine. Good
> > luck! Post the URL. I am not interested in some policy statement a
> > commentator like Chuckie Gibson would call a doctrine...either the
> > Bush Whitehouse isssued a doctrine, calling it such, or they didn't.
> > Seems to me they didn't and Chucko was dipping a little too much into
> > the absinthe when he imagined this doctrine!
>
> "doctrine |?d?ktrin|
> noun
> a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party,
> or other group : the doctrine of predestination.
> € a stated principle of government policy, mainly in foreign or military
> affairs : the Monroe Doctrine.
> ORIGIN late Middle English : from Old French, from Latin doctrina
> Œteaching, learning,¹ from doctor Œteacher,¹ from docere Œteach.¹"
>
> <http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/>
>
> --
> Alan Baker
> Vancouver, British Columbia
> <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

What a lame response. You can cut and paste from an online dicrioanry.
Problem with going general is that by that standard, there are dozens
of Bush Doctrines, so the issue beciomes which one. The Chuckster did
not articulate anything (as he did as moderator of a debate...he
articulated the specific Bush Doctrine his mind conjured up).

You should be concerned about the Canadian election though. I think
it's important to elect someone who will take even more money from
people who work and give it to people who don't want to work. It's
what government in Canada is all about! Keep that "progressive"
tradition going!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 09:21 PM   #18
MNMikeW
 
Posts: 1736
Default Re: Dumb Dems

""R&B"" <> wrote in message
news:...
> "the Moderator" <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message
> news:...
>>
>> "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in
>> message
>> news:clark-...
>>> In article <nnDCk.1227$>,
>>> "Stapler" <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> William Clark wrote:
>>>> > In article <>, The Professor <>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
>>>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna
>>>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that
>>>> >> already too?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
>>>> >
>>>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
>>>> > Roosevelt was.
>>>>
>>>> Fuckhead.
>>>
>>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate.
>>
>> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How
>> is that informed debate?
>
>
> She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school
> kid who studies Civics knows that.
>
> Gimme a break.
>
> randy
>
The so-called "Bush Doctrine" was actually three different things.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 10:20 PM   #19
Jack Hollis
 
Posts: 2096
Default Re: Dumb Dems

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:33:39 -0700 (PDT), The_Professor <>
wrote:

>The Chuckster did
>not articulate anything (as he did as moderator of a debate...he
>articulated the specific Bush Doctrine his mind conjured up).

It was a stupid question.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 10:39 PM   #20
Carbon
 
Posts: 1837
Default Re: Dumb Dems

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:14 -0500, the Moderator wrote:
> "William A. T. Clark" <> wrote in
> message
> news:clark-...
>> In article <nnDCk.1227$>, "Stapler"
>> <> wrote:
>>> William Clark wrote:
>>> > In article <>, The Professor <>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President
>>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna
>>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done
>>> >> that already too?
>>> >>
>>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things?
>>> >
>>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who
>>> > Roosevelt was.
>>>
>>> Fuckhead.
>>
>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate.
>
> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was?

Well, does she? She doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is, and
that's a hell of a lot more current.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO
©2007, TRAVELERA LLC